Information on Result #2475681
Linear OOA(8140, 71, F8, 2, 131) (dual of [(71, 2), 2, 132]-NRT-code), using 32 step truncation based on linear OOA(8172, 87, F8, 2, 163) (dual of [(87, 2), 2, 164]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OOA(810, 6, F8, 2, 10) (dual of [(6, 2), 2, 11]-NRT-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(810, 8, F8, 2, 10) (dual of [(8, 2), 6, 11]-NRT-code), using
- Reed–Solomon NRT-code RS(2;6,8) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(810, 8, F8, 2, 10) (dual of [(8, 2), 6, 11]-NRT-code), using
- linear OOA(8160, 81, F8, 2, 152) (dual of [(81, 2), 2, 153]-NRT-code), using
- repeating each code word 9 times [i] based on linear OOA(816, 9, F8, 2, 16) (dual of [(9, 2), 2, 17]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(2;2,8) [i]
- repeating each code word 9 times [i] based on linear OOA(816, 9, F8, 2, 16) (dual of [(9, 2), 2, 17]-NRT-code), using
- linear OOA(810, 6, F8, 2, 10) (dual of [(6, 2), 2, 11]-NRT-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.