Information on Result #2617932
Linear OOA(2229, 78, F2, 3, 162) (dual of [(78, 3), 5, 163]-NRT-code), using strength reduction based on linear OOA(2229, 78, F2, 3, 163) (dual of [(78, 3), 5, 164]-NRT-code), using
- repeating each code word 2 times [i] based on linear OOA(2112, 39, F2, 3, 81) (dual of [(39, 3), 5, 82]-NRT-code), using
- 2 step truncation [i] based on linear OOA(2114, 40, F2, 3, 83) (dual of [(40, 3), 6, 84]-NRT-code), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
- linear OA(86, 8, F8, 6) (dual of [8, 2, 7]-code or 8-arc in PG(5,8)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(2,8) [i]
- linear OOA(212, 5, F2, 3, 11) (dual of [(5, 3), 3, 12]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(3;F,3P) [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 5, using
- linear OA(86, 8, F8, 6) (dual of [8, 2, 7]-code or 8-arc in PG(5,8)), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
- 2 step truncation [i] based on linear OOA(2114, 40, F2, 3, 83) (dual of [(40, 3), 6, 84]-NRT-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.