Information on Result #2653093
Linear OOA(296, 37, F2, 3, 53) (dual of [(37, 3), 15, 54]-NRT-code), using 5 step truncation based on linear OOA(2101, 39, F2, 3, 58) (dual of [(39, 3), 16, 59]-NRT-code), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OOA(2101, 39, F2, 3, 59) (dual of [(39, 3), 16, 60]-NRT-code), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
- linear OA(169, 13, F16, 9) (dual of [13, 4, 10]-code or 13-arc in PG(8,16)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(169, 16, F16, 9) (dual of [16, 7, 10]-code or 16-arc in PG(8,16)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(7,16) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(169, 16, F16, 9) (dual of [16, 7, 10]-code or 16-arc in PG(8,16)), using
- linear OOA(25, 3, F2, 3, 5) (dual of [(3, 3), 4, 6]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(3;4,2) [i]
- linear OA(169, 13, F16, 9) (dual of [13, 4, 10]-code or 13-arc in PG(8,16)), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.