Information on Result #2662108
Linear OOA(464, 22, F4, 3, 58) (dual of [(22, 3), 2, 59]-NRT-code), using 2 step truncation based on linear OOA(466, 23, F4, 3, 60) (dual of [(23, 3), 3, 61]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OOA(412, 5, F4, 3, 12) (dual of [(5, 3), 3, 13]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(3;3,4) [i]
- linear OOA(451, 18, F4, 3, 47) (dual of [(18, 3), 3, 48]-NRT-code), using
- repeating each code word 2 times [i] based on linear OOA(424, 9, F4, 3, 23) (dual of [(9, 3), 3, 24]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(3;F,3P) [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 9, using
- the Hermitian function field over F4 [i]
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(3;F,3P) [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 9, using
- repeating each code word 2 times [i] based on linear OOA(424, 9, F4, 3, 23) (dual of [(9, 3), 3, 24]-NRT-code), using
- linear OOA(412, 5, F4, 3, 12) (dual of [(5, 3), 3, 13]-NRT-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.