Information on Result #2783191
Linear OOA(2225, 63, F2, 4, 124) (dual of [(63, 4), 27, 125]-NRT-code), using 9 step truncation based on linear OOA(2234, 66, F2, 4, 133) (dual of [(66, 4), 30, 134]-NRT-code), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OOA(2234, 66, F2, 4, 135) (dual of [(66, 4), 30, 136]-NRT-code), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
- linear OA(3216, 22, F32, 16) (dual of [22, 6, 17]-code or 22-arc in PG(15,32)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3216, 32, F32, 16) (dual of [32, 16, 17]-code or 32-arc in PG(15,32)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(16,32) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3216, 32, F32, 16) (dual of [32, 16, 17]-code or 32-arc in PG(15,32)), using
- linear OOA(27, 3, F2, 4, 7) (dual of [(3, 4), 5, 8]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(4;5,2) [i]
- linear OA(3216, 22, F32, 16) (dual of [22, 6, 17]-code or 22-arc in PG(15,32)), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.