Information on Result #2784176
Linear OOA(2248, 75, F2, 4, 116) (dual of [(75, 4), 52, 117]-NRT-code), using 9 step truncation based on linear OOA(2257, 78, F2, 4, 125) (dual of [(78, 4), 55, 126]-NRT-code), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OOA(2257, 78, F2, 4, 127) (dual of [(78, 4), 55, 128]-NRT-code), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
- linear OA(3215, 26, F32, 15) (dual of [26, 11, 16]-code or 26-arc in PG(14,32)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3215, 32, F32, 15) (dual of [32, 17, 16]-code or 32-arc in PG(14,32)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(17,32) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3215, 32, F32, 15) (dual of [32, 17, 16]-code or 32-arc in PG(14,32)), using
- linear OOA(27, 3, F2, 4, 7) (dual of [(3, 4), 5, 8]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(4;5,2) [i]
- linear OA(3215, 26, F32, 15) (dual of [26, 11, 16]-code or 26-arc in PG(14,32)), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.