Information on Result #2784388
Linear OOA(2257, 80, F2, 4, 116) (dual of [(80, 4), 63, 117]-NRT-code), using 1 step truncation based on linear OOA(2258, 81, F2, 4, 117) (dual of [(81, 4), 66, 118]-NRT-code), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OOA(2258, 81, F2, 4, 118) (dual of [(81, 4), 66, 119]-NRT-code), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
- linear OA(6416, 27, F64, 16) (dual of [27, 11, 17]-code or 27-arc in PG(15,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6416, 64, F64, 16) (dual of [64, 48, 17]-code or 64-arc in PG(15,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(48,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6416, 64, F64, 16) (dual of [64, 48, 17]-code or 64-arc in PG(15,64)), using
- linear OOA(26, 3, F2, 4, 6) (dual of [(3, 4), 6, 7]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(4;6,2) [i]
- linear OA(6416, 27, F64, 16) (dual of [27, 11, 17]-code or 27-arc in PG(15,64)), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.