Information on Result #2860492
Linear OOA(2176, 35, F2, 5, 159), using 82 step truncation based on linear OOA(2258, 52, F2, 5, 241) (dual of [(52, 5), 2, 242]-NRT-code), using
- repeating each code word 2 times [i] based on linear OOA(2128, 26, F2, 5, 120) (dual of [(26, 5), 2, 121]-NRT-code), using
- 5 step truncation [i] based on linear OOA(2133, 27, F2, 5, 125) (dual of [(27, 5), 2, 126]-NRT-code), using
- repeating each code word 9 times [i] based on linear OOA(213, 3, F2, 5, 13) (dual of [(3, 5), 2, 14]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(5;2,2) [i]
- repeating each code word 9 times [i] based on linear OOA(213, 3, F2, 5, 13) (dual of [(3, 5), 2, 14]-NRT-code), using
- 5 step truncation [i] based on linear OOA(2133, 27, F2, 5, 125) (dual of [(27, 5), 2, 126]-NRT-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.