Information on Result #2918786
Linear OOA(2181, 30, F2, 6, 161), using 32 step truncation based on linear OOA(2213, 36, F2, 6, 193) (dual of [(36, 6), 3, 194]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OOA(215, 3, F2, 6, 15) (dual of [(3, 6), 3, 16]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(6;3,2) [i]
- linear OOA(2195, 33, F2, 6, 177) (dual of [(33, 6), 3, 178]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OOA(215, 3, F2, 6, 15) (dual of [(3, 6), 3, 16]-NRT-code) (see above)
- linear OOA(2177, 30, F2, 6, 161) (dual of [(30, 6), 3, 162]-NRT-code), using
- repeating each code word 6 times [i] based on linear OOA(227, 5, F2, 6, 26) (dual of [(5, 6), 3, 27]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(6;F,3P) [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 5, using
- repeating each code word 6 times [i] based on linear OOA(227, 5, F2, 6, 26) (dual of [(5, 6), 3, 27]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OOA(215, 3, F2, 6, 15) (dual of [(3, 6), 3, 16]-NRT-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.