Information on Result #2918946
Linear OOA(2244, 41, F2, 6, 219) (dual of [(41, 6), 2, 220]-NRT-code), using 11 step truncation based on linear OOA(2255, 43, F2, 6, 230) (dual of [(43, 6), 3, 231]-NRT-code), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OOA(2255, 43, F2, 6, 231) (dual of [(43, 6), 3, 232]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OOA(215, 3, F2, 6, 15) (dual of [(3, 6), 3, 16]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(6;3,2) [i]
- linear OOA(2237, 40, F2, 6, 215) (dual of [(40, 6), 3, 216]-NRT-code), using
- repeating each code word 8 times [i] based on linear OOA(227, 5, F2, 6, 26) (dual of [(5, 6), 3, 27]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(6;F,3P) [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 5, using
- repeating each code word 8 times [i] based on linear OOA(227, 5, F2, 6, 26) (dual of [(5, 6), 3, 27]-NRT-code), using
- linear OOA(215, 3, F2, 6, 15) (dual of [(3, 6), 3, 16]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.