Information on Result #3014558
There is no (9, 199, 16)-net in base 2, because 141 times m-reduction would yield (9, 58, 16)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(258, 16, S2, 4, 49), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 9 223372 036854 775808 / 25 > 258 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.