Information on Result #3016003
There is no (16, 27, 89)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (16, 26, 89)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 67 197404 > 226 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.