Information on Result #3016895
There is no (20, 55, 44)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (20, 54, 44)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 20414 836118 316282 > 254 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.