Information on Result #3017111
There is no (21, 60, 45)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (21, 59, 45)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 656899 359849 617408 > 259 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.