Information on Result #3018562
There is no (28, 65, 66)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (28, 64, 66)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 20 822013 200742 268544 > 264 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.