Information on Result #3019165
There is no (31, 80, 66)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (31, 79, 66)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 685958 127171 784328 630792 > 279 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.