Information on Result #3019364
There is no (32, 89, 65)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (32, 88, 65)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 330 885312 553330 496313 188304 > 288 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.