Information on Result #3021585
There is no (44, 117, 88)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (44, 116, 88)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 85938 016804 939262 561860 454618 914510 > 2116 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.