Information on Result #3023864
There is no (58, 99, 220)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (58, 98, 220)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 318369 144640 082843 392564 093702 > 298 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.