Information on Result #3023903
There is no (58, 165, 111)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (58, 164, 111)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 31 544875 363194 809686 516993 393385 309955 196974 611568 > 2164 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.