Information on Result #3024621
There is no (63, 118, 184)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (63, 117, 184)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 182467 222295 912684 213142 696981 078356 > 2117 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.