Information on Result #3024895
There is no (65, 90, 887)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (65, 89, 887)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 624 735233 918295 850852 090794 > 289 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.