Information on Result #3024942
There is no (65, 168, 128)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (65, 167, 128)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 214 383568 629809 005246 580263 724730 375366 020496 168141 > 2167 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.