Information on Result #3025362
There is no (68, 165, 139)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (68, 164, 139)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 26 788047 980069 290782 991963 304409 563475 149522 850744 > 2164 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.