Information on Result #3026727
There is no (79, 160, 195)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (79, 159, 195)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 827838 587275 718790 898245 040842 857911 620026 481432 > 2159 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.