Information on Result #3026859
There is no (80, 181, 171)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (80, 180, 171)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 549638 561585 890522 818911 243188 779952 708327 650026 508568 > 2180 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.