Information on Result #3026944
There is no (81, 134, 329)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (81, 133, 329)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 10894 958769 005347 043393 829854 654613 694000 > 2133 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.