Information on Result #3026955
There is no (81, 156, 217)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (81, 155, 217)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 46032 008341 970763 189415 233567 856871 532815 579560 > 2155 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.