Information on Result #3026960
There is no (81, 166, 196)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (81, 165, 196)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 53 636509 331665 302853 313887 897759 511999 185717 023816 > 2165 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.