Information on Result #3026974
There is no (81, 184, 173)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (81, 183, 173)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 14 453544 695606 010877 237221 828952 305548 380579 611959 813632 > 2183 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.