Information on Result #3026975
There is no (81, 186, 171)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (81, 185, 171)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 54 976731 972496 496109 246399 643496 687133 942664 234184 602832 > 2185 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.