Information on Result #3027098
There is no (82, 207, 161)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (82, 206, 161)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 116 951536 897196 041441 381057 146983 114326 849568 189845 051759 309376 > 2206 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.