Information on Result #3027197
There is no (83, 186, 179)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (83, 185, 179)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 53 269506 294587 358246 531035 898989 147212 502098 697905 027390 > 2185 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.