Information on Result #3027198
There is no (83, 188, 177)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (83, 187, 177)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 209 272293 183449 385306 688064 268335 789979 788616 506285 458544 > 2187 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.