Information on Result #3027314
There is no (84, 203, 170)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (84, 202, 170)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 8 148193 021974 804309 675179 528359 910098 060011 630314 347678 910240 > 2202 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.