Information on Result #3027399
There is no (85, 172, 209)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (85, 171, 209)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3497 037589 097971 479633 737055 886313 806109 084230 366560 > 2171 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.