Information on Result #3027417
There is no (85, 196, 178)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (85, 195, 178)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 54406 804635 804856 086559 728195 925302 137860 126958 655038 014976 > 2195 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.