Information on Result #3027431
There is no (85, 224, 163)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (85, 223, 163)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 16 913867 323754 179492 098841 797484 359535 082194 003814 293708 978839 066656 > 2223 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.