Information on Result #3027502
There is no (86, 167, 226)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (86, 166, 226)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 98 763727 875331 028119 597987 932474 101084 530032 637848 > 2166 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.