Information on Result #3027541
There is no (86, 231, 163)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (86, 230, 163)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1948 135434 592509 476261 184071 832495 626405 483968 506075 782736 114749 013256 > 2230 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.