Information on Result #3027613
There is no (87, 180, 206)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (87, 179, 206)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 817388 781522 106567 934698 136689 751586 970657 378524 982800 > 2179 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.