Information on Result #3027710
There is no (88, 171, 231)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (88, 170, 231)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1693 435535 646648 245660 490311 505395 540559 578686 049760 > 2170 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.