Information on Result #3027753
There is no (88, 245, 164)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (88, 244, 164)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 29 540888 155001 238122 697467 742125 868405 634398 462509 448865 176190 908744 519280 > 2244 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.