Information on Result #3027795
There is no (89, 142, 416)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (89, 141, 416)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 2 849471 562930 877802 120046 225961 380529 788991 > 2141 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.