Information on Result #3027813
There is no (89, 178, 222)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (89, 177, 222)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 218356 515802 010523 273612 317818 156922 577578 083235 652130 > 2177 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.