Information on Result #3027816
There is no (89, 184, 211)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (89, 183, 211)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 14 029890 325356 732280 845101 748857 531595 955855 617066 477840 > 2183 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.