Information on Result #3027839
There is no (89, 218, 177)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (89, 217, 177)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 223487 977566 769208 656509 620733 469864 238295 316821 979354 614458 834586 > 2217 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.