Information on Result #3027849
There is no (89, 238, 169)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (89, 237, 169)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 274396 992869 334629 994629 633842 367038 352741 271069 377424 287691 511775 685352 > 2237 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.