Information on Result #3027854
There is no (89, 248, 166)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (89, 247, 166)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 258 993120 451233 563189 698325 992172 036292 453070 630293 668782 953507 335998 264000 > 2247 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.