Information on Result #3028335
There is no (94, 259, 176)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (94, 258, 176)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 617697 189405 140654 686118 227101 472811 171343 809598 126191 514608 116872 496329 451884 > 2258 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.